Conservation
International News Release

The Bamboo lemur |
Antananarivo
Madagascar April 7, 2005 - Mankind's closest living relatives - the
world's apes, monkeys, lemurs and other primates - face increasing peril
from humans and some could soon disappear forever, according to a report
released today by the Primate Specialist Group of IUCN-The World
Conservation Union's Species Survival Commission (SSC) and the
International Primatological Society (IPS), in collaboration with
Conservation International (CI).
Primates in Peril: The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates-2004-2006
reveals that 25 percent-or one in four-of the 625 primate species and
subspecies are at risk of extinction.
The report compiled
by more than 50 experts from 16 countries cites deforestation, commercial
bushmeat hunting, and the illegal animal trade as the primary threats, and
warns that failure to respond will bring the first primate extinctions in
more than a century.

Perrier's sifaka |
The golden-headed
langur of Vietnam and China's Hainan gibbon number only in the dozens. The
Horton Plains slender loris of Sri Lanka has been sighted just four times
since 1937. Perrier's sifaka of Madagascar and the Tana River red colobus
of Kenya are now restricted to tiny patches of tropical forest, leaving
them vulnerable to rapid eradication.
Hunters kill
primates for food and to sell the meat, traders capture them for live
sale, and loggers, farmers, and land developers destroy their habitat.
"More and
more, mankind's closest living relatives are being cornered into shrinking
areas of tropical forest," said CI President Russell A. Mittermeier,
who also chairs the IUCN-SSC Primate Specialist Group.
"This is especially true of Madagascar, one of the planet's
biodiversity hotspots that has lost most of its original forest cover.
More than half its lemurs, none found anywhere else in the world, are
threatened with extinction.

The Cross River
Gorilla |
"Without
immediate steps to protect these unique creatures and their habitat, we
will lose more of our planet's natural heritage forever."
The World's 25 Most
Endangered Primates list, compiled at the 20th Congress of the
International Primatological Society in Turin, Italy, follows similar
reports in 2000 and 2002.
Fifteen of the
primates on the new list, including the Sumatran orangutan of Indonesia
and the northern muriqui of Brazil, are "three-time losers" for
having appeared on all three lists.
Seven are new
additions to the 2004-2006 list, and three appeared once before.

Black-faced lion
tamarin |
Madagascar and
Vietnam each have four primates on the new list, while Brazil and
Indonesia have three, followed by Sri Lanka and Tanzania with two each,
and one each from Colombia, China, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Equatorial
Guinea, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, and Democratic Republic of
Congo. Some primates on the list are found in more than one country.
By region, the list
includes 10 from Asia, seven from Africa, four from Madagascar, and four
from South America, showing that threats to monkeys, lemurs, great apes
and other non-human primates exist wherever they live.
All 25 primates on
the 2004-2006 list are found in the world's biodiversity hotspots-34
regions identified by Conservation International that cover just 2.3
percent of the Earth's land surface but harbor well over 50 percent of all
terrestrial plant and animal diversity.
Eight of the hotspots are considered the highest priorities for the
survival of the most endangered primates: Indo-Burma, Madagascar and the
Indian Ocean Islands, Sundaland, Eastern Afromontane, Coastal Forests of
Eastern Africa, Guinean Forests of West Africa, the Atlantic Forest of
Brazil, and Western Ghats-Sri Lanka.

Pagai pig-tailed
snub-nosed monkey |
Habitat loss due to
the clearing of tropical forests for agriculture, logging, and the
collection of fuel wood continues to be the major factor in the declining
number of primates, according to the report.
Hunting for
subsistence and commercial purposes also is a major and insidious threat,
especially in Africa and Asia. Live capture for the pet trade also poses a
serious threat, particularly to Asian species.
"Southeast
Asia's primates are subject to relentless poaching because of the profits
to be made from the illegal trade," said Chantal Elkin, manager of
the Threatened Species Program in CI's Center for Applied Biodiversity
Science.
"Although some of the region's threatened primates are taken as
pets-notably orangutans and gibbons -they are most often hunted and traded
for use in traditional medicines. Most of this trade appears to be
international, primarily to China."
As "Flagship Species" and our closest living relatives, nonhuman
primates are important to the health of their surrounding ecosystems.
Through the dispersal of seeds and other interactions with their
environments, primates help support a wide range of plant and animal life
that make up the Earth's forests.

Sumatran
orangutan |
The 2004-2006 list
focuses on the severity of the overall threat rather than mere numbers.
Some on the list, such as the Sumatran orangutan, still number in the low
thousands but are disappearing at a faster rate than other primates. The
December tsunamis that devastated coastal Sumatra have triggered a
possible new threat to orangutan habitat from resettlement of area
residents.
Changes to the list from 2002 reflect a desire to draw attention to other
endangered primates. For example, Miss Waldron's red colobus, which has
gone decades without a live sighting, was replaced by the Bioko red
colobus to show that other colobus species also are under extremely grave
threat.
"All evidence tells us that the first extinctions among Africa's
primates will occur among the red colobus," said Thomas Butynski,
director of CI's Eastern Africa Biodiversity Hotspots Program. "Miss
Waldron's red colobus in Ghana and Ivory Coast, and Bouvier's red colobus
in the Republic of Congo may already be extinct, while the Tana River red
colobus in Kenya and Bioko red colobus in Equatorial Guinea could be gone
within the next 20 years."
Click here for the
list of The 25 Most Endangered
Primates.
Conservation
International - http://www.conservation.org |
Nuke
Plants Vulnerable
By H. Josef
Hebert
Associated Press
 |
WASHINGTON April 7,
2005 (AP) It's a nightmare that scientists say could happen.
Terrorists penetrate a nuclear power plant but ignore the
concrete-protected reactor. They're really after the pool of water
containing hundreds of used fuel rods.
Explosive charges lead to an uncontrollable fire, sending radiation into
the air.
A National Academy of Sciences report released Wednesday concludes such an
event could happen. It also says the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and
nuclear industry have not done enough to understand the vulnerability.
It's "a critical national security issue," said the academy's
president, Bruce Alberts, after the release of a report subject to
haggling with regulators over how much of it should remain secret.
The scientific experts found many of the fuel storage pools at nuclear
power plants in 31 states may be vulnerable and that regulators should
conduct a fresh examination of each plant.
In the meantime, plant operators promptly should reconfigure used fuel
rods in the storage pools to lower decay-heat intensity and install spray
devices to reduce the risk of a fire should a storage facility be
attacked, the scientists said.
Congress sought the study because of the heightened concerns that
terrorists might seek to target nuclear power plants.
At 68 plants, including some already shut down, in 31 states, thousands of
used reactor fuel rods are in deep water pools. Dry, concrete casks hold a
smaller number of these rods.
Much more highly radioactive fuel is stored in pools than is in the more
protected reactors -- 103 in total -- at these sites.
 |
Some scientists and
nuclear watchdog groups long have contended that these pools pose a much
greater danger to a catastrophic attack than do the reactors themselves.
Some plants where pools are all or partially underground present less of a
problem. Others, including a series of boiling-water reactors where pools
are more exposed, represent greater concern, said Bob Alvarez, a former
Energy Department official who has argued for increased protection of used
reactor fuel at nuclear plants.
The experts' report "pretty well legitimizes what we've been
saying," Alvarez said in an interview.
The scientific panel said reinforced concrete storage pools -- 25 feet to
45 feet deep, with water circulating to keep the fuel assemblies from
overheating -- could tempt terrorists.
The report said an aircraft or high explosive attack could cause water to
drain from the pools and expose the fuel rods, unleashing an
uncontrollable fire and large amounts of radiation.
Nuclear regulators said they would give the report's recommendations
"serious consideration." But the NRC has disputed many findings
and suggestions from the experts.
After the classified document was provided to members of Congress last
month, the NRC's chairman told lawmakers in a letter that some of the
panel's assessments about plants' vulnerabilities were
"unreasonable" and that certain conclusions "lacked sound
technical basis."
"Today, spent fuel is better protected than ever," Nils Diaz
wrote.
The NRC said it believes the potential for large releases of radiation
from such a fire "to be extremely low." Still, the agency has
advised reactor operations to consider refiguring the pools' fuel rods --
pairing new ones with older ones to reduce the heat.
Kevin Crowley, the scientific panel's staff director, said the classified
version of the report includes "some attack scenarios well within the
means of terrorists" that could result in a catastrophic fire of
spent fuel.
Nuclear safety advocates said the report recognizes, for the first time,
the vulnerability of spent fuel.
David Lochbaum, a nuclear industry watchdog for the Union of Concerned
Scientists, said the study makes clear that regulators have not acted
aggressively enough.
"Three years after 9/11, our hope would have been more of that
homework had been done," Lochbaum said.
The industry says its system of storing the fuel is safe and protected.
But in response to the report, the industry said it was "assessing
the potential to augment" safety systems for spent fuel facilities.
 |
Marvin Fertel, a
senior executive at the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's trade
group, said a computer analysis the industry commissioned in 2002 showed
that fuel pool structures would withstand, without a significant loss of
water, the impact of an aircraft crash.
But the study said the pools vary among plants and reactor designs, and
that some are more vulnerable than others.
The panel said dry cask storage provides better protection. It also said
significant numbers of used fuel rods always will have to be stay in pools
for as long as five years before they adequately cool. At least
one-quarter of the power plants now have some of their spent fuel in dry
casks.
The panel said the government should look into more widespread use of dry
cask storage as part of its detailed assessment of risks.
The academy is a private organization chartered by Congress to advise the
government of scientific matters.
Yucca Mountain
Squabble Continues
By Erica
Werner
Associated Press
WASHINGTON April 6, 2005 (AP) The planned nuclear waste dump at Yucca
Mountain in Nevada won't be built unless the Energy Department is
confident of the supporting science after investigating e-mails that
showed workers discussing fabricating data, an official said Tuesday.
Under angry
questioning from Nevada lawmakers, deputy director Theodore Garrish said
the department was preparing to apply for a license to run the dump, but
"we have not made a final decision yet as to when or whether to file
those documents, and some of that will be based on this
investigation."
"I can assure you we will not go forward unless we can have the
feeling ourselves first that this repository will be safe," said
Garrish.
Reassurances from Garrish and Charles Groat, the director of the U.S.
Geological Survey, didn't satisfy the Nevadans. They have seized on the
e-mails, written by USGS employees, as the latest reason to kill the dump
planned for 90 miles north of Las Vegas.
Officials from Gov.
Kenny Guinn on down expressed outrage Tuesday during a House Government
Reform subcommittee hearing.
"The fact that data may have been intentionally fabricated in service
of shoring up predetermined and politically driven conclusions calls into
question the very legitimacy of this entire program," Guinn said.

Location
of the proposed Yucca Nuclear Waste dump |
The Energy
Department disclosed March 16 that e-mails written between 1998 and 2000,
principally by two USGS scientists, suggested the workers might have
falsified documents. Porter's committee has released redacted versions of
dozens of the e-mails that show workers discussing concocting facts and
keeping two sets of figures, one for themselves and one to show quality
assurance officers.
In one e-mail a USGS scientist wrote: "I don't have a clue when these
programs were installed. So I've made up the dates and names. ... This is
as good as it's going to get. If they need more proof, I will be happy to
make up more stuff."
The workers were
studying how water moved through the desert site where the government
wants to store 77,000 tons of commercial and defense nuclear waste from
the nation's power plants and other sources for at least 10,000 years. The
USGS validated Energy Department conclusions that water seepage was
relatively slow, so radiation would be less likely to escape.
In written testimony, Garrish downplayed the significance of the e-mails.
"This appears to be a lapse in quality assurance protocol and, at
this time, we have no evidence that the underlying science was
affected," his written testimony said.
He seemed to soften his position when he addressed the subcommittee,
suggesting more study was needed.
"The impact of this issue is yet to be determined, and yes, we are
concerned about the integrity of the data, and what was done was
inexcusable," Garrish said.
The inspectors general of the Energy and Interior departments are
conducting criminal investigations with help from the FBI, and the Energy
Department is studying the impact on the scientific underpinnings of the
planned waste dump site.
But Nevada
lawmakers called Tuesday for additional reviews. Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev.,
who chaired Tuesday's hearing, said he wanted an independent commission
similar to the presidential commission that investigated the 1979 accident
at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island.
Porter also said he was summoning the two main USGS workers who wrote the
e-mails to testify at a hearing next week. Their identities have not been
released. Groat said Tuesday they are no longer on the Yucca project but
are still employed by USGS.
John Mitchell Jr.,
president and general manager of Bechtel SAIC, the Energy Department's
managing contractor on the Yucca project, also testified Tuesday. He said
the e-mails were originally discovered by Bechtel workers in early
December and were discussed by high-ranking company officials, but weren't
turned over to the Energy Department until March.
Porter was the only member of the House Government Reform federal work
force and agency organization subcommittee to attend Tuesday's panel. He
invited Nevada's other two House members, Republican Jim Gibbons and
Democrat Shelley Berkley, to join him in questioning witnesses. That
turned the three-hour hearing into a face-off between Nevadans adamantly
opposed to Yucca and government officials committed to it, and there was
little budging on either side.
 |
A planned
completion date of 2010 for the Yucca project was recently abandoned by
Energy Department officials. A new date has not yet been set.
DOE To Move
Nuclear Waste
By Travis
Reed
Associated Press
SALT LAKE CITY April 7, 2005 (AP) The Energy Department on Wednesday
proposed to move a huge pile of radioactive waste away from the banks of
the Colorado River - a victory for environmentalists and Western
politicians who fear the debris could poison the Southwest's major source
of drinking water.
The 12 million-ton pile -- a mostly open-air heap that sits on bare ground
and is surrounded only by a chain-link fence -- sits on a flood plain 750
feet (225 meters) from a river that supplies drinking water to about 25
million people in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix and other cities.
The Energy Department said it will recommend in an environmental impact
statement that the waste be moved to a closed storage facility about 30
miles (50 kilometers) to the north, near Crescent Junction.
The department will review all public comment before issuing a final
decision, probably early this summer, according to Don Metzler, who
manages the site from the department's Grand Junction, Colorado, office.
"I certainly hoped for this decision," said Rep. Jim Matheson, a
Utah Democrat. "Moving the pile has always been, in my opinion, the
right thing to do. Short-term cost considerations, I feared, were driving
us to look at keeping the pile in place."
The site, covering 130 acres (52 hectares) near the town of Moab, is the
only decommissioned uranium mill overseen by the Energy Department that
has yet to be cleaned up. The 94-foot (28-meter)-tall pile contains dirt,
toxic chemicals and traces of radioactive substances left behind from
decades of uranium ore processing.
The immediate concern is that the waste is seeping into the soil and
groundwater, and working its way into the Colorado River.
Environmentalists say the contamination is already killing fish.
The larger,
doomsday fear is that a major flood on the Colorado could wash the stuff
into the river and poison the water with residual uranium, radon, ammonia
and other dangerous material.
 |
At the new
location, the waste would be covered and buried in a hole, lined with a
protective layer to keep the material from seeping into the groundwater.
Depending on how the waste got there -- by rail, truck or pipeline -- the
cleanup would cost an estimated $407 million (euro316.5 million) to $472
million (euro367 million).
The waste began piling up in the 1950s after the dawn of the atomic age
turned sleepy little communities in Utah into uranium mining boom towns.
The department took control of the site in 2001 after the most recent
owner of the mill, Denver-based Atlas Corp., declared bankruptcy in 1998
when it realized it could not afford to deal with the mess.
In November, the Energy Department outlined four options for the site.
Three of them called for moving the waste and burying it anywhere from 17
miles (27 kilometers) to 85 miles (137 kilometers) away in a hole. Option
No. 4, which could cost only half as much, called for leaving the pile in
place but covering it over with dirt and rocks.
But Gov. Jon Huntsman, Utah's congressional delegation, scores of
activists and the Environmental Protection Agency warned that waste is too
dangerous to leave it so close to the Colorado River.
The Energy Department has shown it is "willing to listen and work
with us to find a reasonable solution for the mill tailings that pose a
very real threat to the Colorado River and downstream water users,"
Huntsman said in a statement. |

The last of the
starship Enterprise? (Paramount) |
Enterprise - Is
It Is or Is It Ain't?
Hollywood April 7, 2005 (Sci Fi Wire) - Organizers of Trek United, the fan
fund-raising campaign to save UPN's canceled Star Trek: Enterprise, are
telling fans that they are in secret discussions with Paramount
representatives about keeping the show alive, and that the reps have left
open the possibility the show may return.
But a spokesman for Paramount denied to SCI FI Wire that such talks are
taking place, adding definitively:
"That is not
true. The decision to end the show is final."
So what's the truth?
"I think it's probably a case of the left hand not knowing what the
right hand is doing," Candice McCallie, the Houston-based spokeswoman
for Trek United, told SCI FI Wire in a separate interview.
"I mean, it's a large company, of course, and we've talked to a
couple of different people there. Now, as far as whatever they're telling
you, my guess is, you know, we've tried to be as open as possible about
it. Maybe telling people that we're talking with Paramount was a mistake.
But ... until something is signed sealed on the dotted line, they're not
going to say anything different from what they said back in
February."
McCallie declined to name the group's Paramount contacts, except to say
they were "people above the producers."
McCallie added: "Just because he doesn't know what is going on
doesn't mean that we haven't talked to someone or spoken to someone about
the possibility of the show coming back. ... Obviously, if the possibility
wasn't there, they wouldn't fool with us. They would never even
acknowledge our existence. I mean, what would be the point?"

Trek United has
raised nearly $3.14
million (Paramount) |
Trek United has
raised nearly $3.14 million in pledges and contributions from fans eager
to finance a fifth season of Enterprise, and McCallie said that donors are
promised their money back if the show doesn't come back, "except for
the 5 percent handling fee to cover the banks and Paypal and all that kind
of stuff."
Some fans have raised concerns about Trek United and its campaign on the
official Star Trek: Enterprise message boards. McCallie said that she
understood such concerns, but added that the group has been aboveboard in
its representations.
"The legally binding document is there," she said. "It's
all open on the Internet. All of our names are out there. ... We've [been]
pretty open about the whole entire thing.
"Our only goal
is to try to get the show back, and we're spending a lot of time and a lot
of work and a lot of money out of pocket, and there's no reason for us to
do that if we can't get the show back, because, obviously, we've got a
legally binding agreement with the contributions. So there is no danger of
our embezzling the money or anything like that."
Trek United - http://www.trekunited.com
Enterprise Official - http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/ENT/index.html
It's your
money, but according to most sources, the Enterprise sets are down
at Paramount. Pretty much an indication that all Trek production is
on indefinite hiatus as one of the two now empty Paramount stages
was Trek-dedicated since the late 1970s. Enterprise fans thinking to
invest should read this two-part interview with Bill Hamm (Gene
Roddenberry's Andromeda) explaining why they should just save their
money. Tribune Entertainment's head honcho says dividing up the
rights to a series after the original deal is struck makes late
blooming independent investors a bad idea. Ed.
Bill Hamm Interview - http://www.andromedatv.com/about/behind_billhamm01.html |
Star Trek New
Voyages Has Chekov!

New Voyages
blows up Enterprise in Episode 2 (Cow Creek) |
Ticonderoga NY
April 3, 2005 (AP) Walter Koenig, who portrayed starship helmsman
Chekov in the original "Star Trek" TV series and seven movies,
will be in Ticonderoga for two weeks in September to shoot a "Star
Trek" featurette for distribution on the Internet.
James Cawley, of Ticonderoga in the eastern Adirondacks, will again
portray Captain James Kirk in the video, the third to be shot by the New
Voyages group.
Cawley, currently performing as an Elvis Presley tribute-artist in a
Biloxi, Mississippi theater, tells the Plattsburgh Press-Republican the
short feature will be shot on the sets he has constructed in a Ticonderoga
warehouse.
In a statement released through his agent, Koenig says he's looking
forward to filming in Ticonderoga, though he'd thought the Chekov role was
behind him. "But then the folks from New Voyages approached, and we
started kicking around ideas for a Chekov story."
Since "Star Trek," Koenig has appeared in numerous movies and TV
series, most recently as a villain on "Babylon 5."
Star Trek New Voyages Official - http://www.newvoyages.com
Grey's
Anatomy Versus Boston Legal?

The cast of
'Grey's Anatomy'. (Reuters) |
LOS ANGELES April
8, 2005 (Zap2it.com) - It's the kind of choice that most networks not
named "CBS" would probably kill for: Do
you return your successful first-year drama to the air after a planned
hiatus, or do you stick with the even more successful replacement drama?
In the end, ABC
just looked at the numbers and elected to have "Grey's Anatomy"
keep the coveted 10 p.m. ET time slot on Sunday nights, rather than having
"Boston Legal" return on April 24 as previously scheduled.
As a result of the move, announced Friday (April 8), "Grey's
Anatomy" will continue to be partnered with "Desperate
Housewives" through the end of the May sweeps period and the
conclusion of the official 2004-05 season.
ABC gave "Boston Legal" an early 2005-06 renewal earlier this
week, but the David E. Kelley won't air again until next fall. The five
unseen episodes from this season will become the start of a 27-episode
second season for "Boston Legal."
"We're in the enviable position of having two shows that have each
performed extremely well for us Sundays at 10:00 -- 'Boston Legal' and
'Grey's Anatomy,'" says ABC Entertainment Present Stephen McPherson.
"We had already picked up 'Boston Legal' for next year based on its
stellar run thus far this season. Now, with the strong debut of 'Grey's
Anatomy,' we are very optimistic about having an additional asset of
tremendous value heading into fall. However, with this embarrassment of
riches comes a tough decision."

The cast of
Boston Legal (ABC) |
The numbers were
fairly straight forward. For the season, "Desperate Housewives"
has averaged nearly 22.8 million viewers per week, as the drama has come
out of nowhere to become television's second most watched drama. With its
17 original episodes this season, "Boston Legal" has averaged
12.5 million viewers, making it one of year's top new shows. However, in
two episodes since its midseason premiere, "Grey's Anatomy" has
averaged just under 17 million viewers, building on its audience from its
first to second weeks.
Originally, the "Anatomy" Sunday run was only to be four
episodes, but its instant success led to a reevaluation of those plans.
There had been rumors that ABC was considering shifting "Boston
Legal" to Monday nights at 10 p.m., which would have mirrored a
similar scheduling shift that nearly killed its parent drama "The
Practice."
"Ultimately we decided that, without having adequate lead time or
marketing dollars to devote to moving either show so late in the season,
we'd continue to let 'Grey's' build on its tremendous momentum through
May," McPherson explains. "We're extremely excited that this
will give us the amazing luxury of bringing 'Boston Legal' back next
season with an unheard-of 27 original episodes."
ABC Official - http://www.abc.com
Lost and
Housewives Renewed - Also Alias and Boston Legal
By Cynthia
Littleton

ABC's Lost -
renewing the biggest surprise was no surprise. |
LOS ANGELES April
5, 2005 (Hollywood Reporter) - ABC has given early renewal notices to four
drama series for the 2005-06 season -- "Alias," "Boston
Legal," "Desperate Housewives" and "Lost."
The full-season, 22-episode pickups for "Housewives" and
"Lost," both from Disney's Touchstone Television studio, came as
no surprise.
The two freshman
dramas have led ABC's remarkable ratings turnaround this season.
"Alias," also from Touchstone, was widely expected to return for
a fifth season, but the early nod to David E. Kelley's "Boston
Legal," a spinoff of "The Practice" from 20th Century Fox
TV, came as a strong vote of confidence for the first-year series that has
been a middling ratings performer in the cushy Sunday 10 p.m. slot behind
"Housewives."
"Housewives," the ensemble drama about the lives of four
suburban women, stormed out of the box in October as the hottest new
commodity to hit prime time in years. The Sunday 9 p.m. drama is far and
away the top-rated new series of the season, averaging 22.8 million
viewers and a 10 rating/22 share in the key adults 18-49 demographic for
the season to date.
"Housewives" ranks No. 3 among all prime-time series this season
in adults 18-49 (behind only the Tuesday and Wednesday editions of Fox's
"American Idol") and is No. 4 among all series in the
total-viewers derby (behind "Idol"-Tuesday, CBS' "CSI:
Crime Scene Investigation" and "Idol"-Wednesday).
"Lost" has invigorated ABC's Wednesday lineup in the anchor 8
p.m. slot. The thriller about a group of plane-crash survivors on a remote
island defied naysayers who predicted it would not be able to maintain the
intensity of its two-hour pilot throughout the season. So far,
"Lost" has averaged 15.9 million viewers and a 5.8 rating/16
share in adults 18-49.

Desperate
swimsuit issue of Vanity Fair |
"Lost"
also has given a leg up to its Wednesday 9 p.m. companion
"Alias," which is enjoying its highest ratings ever this season
after relocating from Sunday last fall. For the season to date, the
Jennifer Garner espionage drama is pulling in an average of 11.2 million
viewers and 4.7/11 in adults 18-49.
"Boston Legal," which stars James Spader and William Shatner as
hard-charging defense attorneys, has benefited from its proximity to
"Housewives" in its freshman year, averaging 12.5 million
viewers and 4.9/12.
"Legal" has been benched for the past two weeks to make room for
mid-season drama "Grey's Anatomy," an ensemble about female
medical students that has done a better job of holding on to its
"Housewives" lead-in than "Legal."
There was no official word from ABC on the prospects for an early pickup
of Touchstone's "Anatomy," but sources said discussions are
under way given the solid Nielsen numbers the show has posted in its two
airings to date.
The series starring Sandra Oh and Patrick Dempsey has averaged 17 million
viewers and a 7.4/18 in adults 18-49.
Jane Fonda
Protests War - Promotes Book

Jane and her
book
(REUTERS/ Tweed) |
NEW YORK April 7,
2005 (AP) - Another war another protest from Jane Fonda.
Fonda was on CBS' "Late Show with David Letterman" Wednesday
night and Letterman asked how she feels about the war in Iraq. Fonda got a
big hand from Letterman's audience when she said, "I think the war is
wrong. I think it's a mistake and I think we that should get out."
Letterman had just held up the infamous photo of Fonda sitting on a North
Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun. Fonda,
who is promoting her autobiography, "My Life So Far," said she
is the "lightning rod" for the still open wounds of the Vietnam
war and she feels "sad about that."
Fonda told Letterman her image as Hanoi Jane is a creation of ideologues
to "promulgate their right wing, narrow world view. It really doesn't
have anything to do with me and it's kind of sick."
CBS
Cameraman Detained in Iraq
BAGHDAD April 9, 2005 (AP) - A cameraman carrying CBS press credentials
was detained in Iraq earlier this week on suspicion of insurgent activity,
the U.S. military said Friday, while the network issued a statement saying
it was investigating the incident.
The cameraman suffered minor injuries Tuesday during a battle between U.S.
soldiers and suspected insurgents, and was standing next to an alleged
insurgent who was killed during the shootout, the military said.
The military issued a statement at the time saying the cameraman was shot
because his equipment was mistaken for a weapon. But on Friday, the
military said the cameraman was detained because there was probable cause
to believe he posed "an imperative threat to coalition forces."
"He is currently detained and will be processed as any other security
detainee," the military said.
In a statement released Friday, CBS News said the man had worked as a
freelancer for CBS for three months and that he was videotaping for the
network when he was shot.
"It is common practice in Iraq for Western news organizations to hire
local cameramen in places considered too dangerous for Westerners to work
effectively. The very nature of their work often puts them in the middle
of very volatile situations," the statement said.
"CBS News continues to investigate the situation, and when more
information becomes available, we will report it."
Gay TV is
Here!
By Kimberly
Speight

Chad Allen will
star as a gay
detective in Ice Blues. |
LOS ANGELES April
5, 2005 (Hollywood Reporter) - Here!, the premium cable network tailored
for gay and lesbian viewers, unveiled an ambitious programming lineup on
Tuesday, and said it has inked on-demand carriage agreements with Cox
Communications and Comcast that put the channel in 40 million U.S.
households.
"We originally launched with broad-based general entertainment
programming for the gay and lesbian community," Here! CEO Paul
Colichman said. "Now we're adding a whole layer of sophistication --
we're keeping general entertainment programming but also adding in more
provocative fare."
The development slate encompasses original series, movies and specials,
including:
"John Waters Presents," a series of independent films selected
by the director that he will host.
"Triple Threat," a series from writer Shawn Postoff ("Queer
as Folk") that revolves around three young men who start a theater
company in New York and are entwined in a relationship.
"Ice Blues: A Donald Strachey Mystery," a sequel to "Third
Man Out: A Donald Strachey Mystery," starring Chad Allen ("Dr.
Quinn, Medicine Woman") as a gay detective in upstate New York.
"Ryan's Life," an original series about a gay teenager coming
out and his experiences in dating.

Director John
Waters |
"The Elizabeth
Birch Project," in which the former executive director of the Human
Rights Campaign features guests from the realms of politics, activism and
entertainment, including Pat Buchanan, Rosie O'Donnell and Chris Matthews.
Colichman added that another goal of the network's slate is to
"record images and stories of the (gay and lesbian) community from
the past, present and future," as with the feature-length biopics
"Bayard Rustin," about the black civil rights leader who was
gay, and "Nijinsky," which tells the story of the legendary
ballet dancer and his tumultuous relationship with Diaghilev.
Here! said its deal with Comcast sees it providing video-on-demand content
to the cable operator priced at $3.99 per title for digital cable
customers.
As part of the Cox
deal, Here! will be available to digital cable customers in the company's
On Demand markets as a subscription VOD service for $6.95 per month
starting this month.
"Being in over 40 million homes is a very important number in the
world of cable," Colichman said. "Once you reach that level of
distribution, it's the real deal."
Here! was established in 2002 by Regent Entertainment co-founders
Colichman and Stephen Jarchow.
MGM Lion
Lies Down
LOS ANGELES April 8, 2005 (AP) - The sale of venerable film studio
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer to a consortium led by Sony Corp of America was
completed Friday, marking the end of MGM as an independent player in the
entertainment industry.

Goodbye Leo! |
The Sony-led group
paid $12 a share for MGM, or about $2.94 billion cash, and assumed about
$1.9 billion in MGM debt.
MGM will release films already in production, including the Steve Martin
comedy "The Pink Panther" this fall. In the future, Sony plans
to co-produce films with MGM.
Movies already in production by the United Artists unit of MGM also will
be released. But it was unclear whether Sony, which has its own
independent film companies, will continue the UA label.
As a result of the deal, Sony and consortium partner Comcast Corp. will
gain access to MGM's library of more than 4,000 movies. Comcast has said
it will use the films on its video-on-demand service and as the basis for
new cable channels.
MGM will continue to develop and produce TV shows such as "Stargate
SG-1."
Other members of the consortium include Providence Equity Partners, Texas
Pacific Group and DLJ Merchant Banking Partners.
In trading Friday, Sony shares fell 20 cents to finish at $40.34 on the
New York Stock Exchange.
[As MGM winds down, Warner Brothers TV, AKA The WB, is celebrating its
50th anniversary with a cute online sweepstakes game at http://www.wbtv50sweeps.com
- be aware that it is a heavy load for dial-up users. Ed.]
3D Movies!
By Edie
Riggins

Lucas wants his
3-D! (Reuters/
Ethan Miller) |
LOS ANGELES April
6, 2005 (Reuters) - If luminary directors George Lucas and James Cameron
get their way, a new wave of three-dimensional movies may soon replace
goofy, 1950s flicks like "Bwana Devil" that played to bug-eyed
audiences wearing blue and red glasses.
"Titanic" captain Cameron, "Stars Wars" master Lucas
and even "Lord of the Rings" head hobbit Peter Jackson want fans
to forget those odd spectacles.
This new 3D wave, they say, converts their old titles to in-your-face
entertainment that may reignite box office fire for movies being
re-released, and it puts audiences directly in the action of new films
like Cameron's 2007 science fiction adventure "Battle Angel."
The new 3D movies do not replace traditional films. Audiences will get two
versions of the same movie for different experiences, and studios and
theaters get two movies to market.
Glasses are needed
to view the new 3D, although the cardboard cut-outs with blue and red
lenses are replaced by plastic frames and clear lenses.
Behind the push for 3D is a major industry overhaul called "digital
cinema," which means projecting movies onscreen from digital files,
as opposed to filmstrip and showing them with projection systems that cost
up to $100,000 a unit to install.
Digital Cinema is supported by Hollywood's major studios who will sharply
cut film-releasing costs because they no longer have to ship thousands of
filmstrips around the world. Rather, they can transmit cheap digital files
via satellite that are then stored on computer networks inside the
theaters.

Where are the
holodecks when you
need them? |
But the transition
will be expensive -- perhaps costing as much as $3.6 billion over the next
several years, industry watchers said.
Theater owners are demanding the studios pay, and they want new types of
content and movies to help pack houses for the digital cinema systems. The
directors say they have one answer -- updating an old idea, 3D.
BACK TO THE FUTURE, AGAIN
"We're making these movies, and we believe in the technology,"
Cameron said at a recent convention of theater owners in Las Vegas called
ShoWest. "People are seeking out that premium 3D experience."
Lucas, whose "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" hits
theaters next month, wants to re-release the entire "Star Wars"
series in 3D starting in 2007, and Peter Jackson hinted that a re-release
"Lord of the Rings" movies might be coming.
Three-dimensional movies date back to the origins of filmmaking before the
20th century, but it was in the 1950s that the 3D gimmick hit big in
Hollywood. Showman Sidney W. Pink was among the vanguard of filmmakers in
the arena, producing 1952's "Bwana Devil" about man-eating
lions.

Scene from the
original 3D version of
House of Wax (Warners) |
One year later,
Warner Bros. sat Vincent Price in audience laps in the 3D version of
"House of Wax." It racked up $23.75 million at box office, a
major haul at the time.
Warner Bros. is
among the backers of new 3D after seeing a small box office bonanza with
2004's 3D version of Christmas movie "The Polar Express" at
giant screen IMAX theaters.
"When you have a big movie like 'The Polar Express' and you convert
it to an IMAX presentation, you also add to the event itself. (Creating an
event) is another way of helping market a film," said Dan Fellman,
Warner Bros head of distribution.
"Polar Express" brought in $282 million at theaters worldwide,
and $45 million of that was at IMAX.
SHOW ME THE TECHNOLOGY
While old 3D movies with the funky blue-and-red glasses often made
audiences dizzy, the new technology that converts 2D film to 3D digital
pictures has reduced side effects, said Charles Swartz, executive director
of the Entertainment Technology Center at the University of Southern
California.
Swartz said that some technical issues remain, but he also believes the
time is ripe for a renaissance. "When you look at the movies that are
most successful today like 'Spiderman 2' they tend to be movies in which
there is a lot of opportunity to use depth to make the movie even more
compelling."
 |
In-Three Inc is one
of the companies that converts a 2D feature film into 3D at a basic cost
of $4.5 million per movie. The cost changes based on the complexity of the
feature.
Michael Kaye, chief executive of In-Three thinks 3D will become a chief
catalyst to the rollout of digital cinema systems because it changes the
focus for theater owners from spending money on the systems to making
money from them.
"The focus is really on the content that uses digital cinema to get
it on screen." said Kaye. "Exhibitors have all said this (3D)
was the first reason they had to go digital."
Another company behind the 3D push, called Real D, has convinced Mann
Theatres to install their 3D delivery system at the famed Grauman's
Chinese Theatre complex in Hollywood.
"3D is going to succeed this time" because of new digital
production and releasing, said Real D chief Michael Lewis.
Cameron obviously agrees. At ShoWest, he had this to say to thousands of
theater owners. "I'm giving you guys plenty of warning," he
said. "You've got two years to get ready."
Phyllis
Diller
By BOB
THOMAS
Associated Press Writer

Phyllis Diller
poses with her photos at her
home in Brentwood . (AP Photo/ Chris Pizzello) |
LOS ANGELES April
7, 2005 - On a chilly March night in San Francisco 50 years ago, a
suburban housewife stood in the spotlight at the avant-garde Purple Onion
night club and rapid-fired jokes about managing a household with five
children and an indolent husband she called Fang.
Female standup comics had never made the big-time, but Phyllis Diller beat
the odds, paving the way for Lily Tomlin, Roseanne Barr, Whoopi Goldberg,
Ellen DeGeneres and others who followed. Diller did it despite a squalid
marriage and recurring poverty. Even as she was attracting notice at the
Purple Onion, she and her family were evicted from their home for
nonpayment of rent.
Diller relates her saga in her new memoir, "Like a Lampshade in a
Whorehouse," written with Richard Buskin.
Don't let the sassy
title the punch line of a joke fool you.
Although the text
is interspersed with some of her best one-liners, the book is really a
moving account of a woman who dealt with many obstacles: two disastrous
marriages, a schizophrenic child, the struggle for a career in the man's
world of comedy.
She recently told The Associated Press how she came to write the book:
"All my life people said, `You got to write a book.' I never wanted
to. Why? I don't know. No. 1, I'm not good at sitting down on long-term
deals.
 |
"I gave up
standup in 2002, and book offers started coming in. And I really wasn't
that busy. Then
they started offering me cash; that always gets my attention.
"Finally, I accepted an offer, and we started working. It was
painful. There were things that I kicked under the rug and tried to
forget. I brought them out for the book; otherwise, there wouldn't be any
truth in it."
Diller was interviewed at her Brentwood mansion, 10,000-square feet on one
acre that she bought 40 years ago. At 87 she looks much younger she
was the first celebrity to acknowledge publicly to a face lift. The
white-blond curly wig was in place, and the Diller laugh still seemed
capable of stopping freeway traffic.
She quit performing three years ago after several incidents in which she
had to leave the stage because she feared a fainting spell. She now wears
a pacemaker.

Diller with Hope
(AMC) |
Does she miss
performing?
"I don't miss the travel," she says. "I miss the laughter.
I do miss the actual hour. I don't want to sound like I'm on dope, but
that hour is a high; it's as good as you can feel. A wonderful, wonderful
happiness, and great power."
Diller claims she has never been so busy in her life, including promoting
a documentary about her final show; the film won first-prize at the San
Diego Film Festival and was shown at Aspen.
"And I have an active social life," she brags. "Next week,
five dinner parties! And I have things to wear. I love clothes. God, do I
love clothes."
Her years on the road had lows as well as the highs. There was the time
she faced a late-night audience of four at a New York club. She played her
whole act for them. Her very worst date was at a basement club in
Washington, D.C.
"The audience was made up of traveling salesmen and hookers,"
she recalls. "I was bombing with my precious jokes about irony and
children. And Bob Hope came in.

Diller and Buddy
Hackett (AP) |
"He saw
through the whole thing. He saw a person not giving up, not blaming the
audience, getting on with the material, sailing through it just like it
was working, bowing and leaving the stage."
Hope, who had seen Diller on Jack Paar's TV show, told her she was great.
That encounter led to three movies together, 22 television specials and
many personal appearances, including a trip to Southeast Asia to entertain
U.S. troops during the Vietnam War.
When she was 68, Diller finally found the man of her dreams. He was Robert
P. Hastings, 75, co-founder of a prestigious law firm with offices on both
coasts, a widower educated at Yale University and Harvard University. They
were introduced by a mutual friend and the pair immediately clicked. They
never married, but they became steady companions. He died of a stroke in
1996.
Diller was hit with more tragedies: two of her children died, another was
institutionalized. Through all her travails, she sought refuge in a book
she first read in 1951: "The Magic in Believing," by Claude M.
Bristol. The book, she says, showed her how to tap into the power of
imagination and self-belief.
Throughout her lifetime, whenever she had a setback, challenge or tragedy,
she countered with the mantra, "Give me strength." |