University
of Washington Press Release
June 17, 2004 - When the Stardust spacecraft met up with comet Wild 2 in
January, scientists fully expected pictures to show a big chunk of rock
and ice liberally coated with dark dust, obscuring any interesting
features.
Instead, they got images rich with broad mesas, craters, pinnacles and
canyons with flat floors and sheer walls, all sharply defined and covering
the comet's surface area of about 20 square miles.
"It's completely unexpected. We were expecting the surface to look
more like it was covered with pulverized charcoal," said Donald
Brownlee, a University of Washington astronomy professor and Stardust's
principal investigator.
Stardust, launched by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in
1999, is returning to Earth with thousands of particles less than a
millimeter in size. They were captured during a flyby Jan. 2 as they
streamed from Wild 2 at more than 13,000 miles per hour. Several particles
larger than bullets actually struck the spacecraft, Brownlee said.
A capsule carrying the sample is to parachute into the Utah desert in
January 2006.
In the meantime, it appears the scientists will have more than they
expected to keep them busy, in part from 72 pictures of Wild 2's nucleus
taken by the spacecraft's navigation camera.
Brownlee is the
lead author of a paper in the June 18 edition of Science describing Wild
2's surface as seen in those photographs, taken as Stardust flew less than
150 miles from the comet's nucleus. Three other papers in the same edition
describe jets visible on the comet's surface that spew material into space
at supersonic speeds; the unexpectedly chaotic distribution of dust
particles coming off the comet; and a mass spectrometer analysis of the
particles' composition. Brownlee is a co-author of two of those
papers.
The paper discussing the photographs describes two different kinds of
craters, probably created when other space bodies slammed into the comet
nucleus. One type has a rounded central pit and a surrounding terrain that
is rough, presumably because material was ejected during the impact. The
other type has a flat floor and nearly vertical cliffs. The scientists
have assigned names to some of the craters, including two called Right
Foot and Left Foot because of their uncanny resemblance to
footprints.
But unlike craters you might find on Earth, the moon or other solar system
bodies, these are remarkably free of powder or other debris that fell back
to the surface after the impact, making it possible to clearly see their
features.
One reason there is so little debris appears to be the makeup of the
nucleus, Brownlee said. He likened it to a clump of hard dirt that can
absorb impact but is brittle so it loses some material when it is hit.
Another reason is that there's not much to bring the powder back to the
surface once it has been ejected from a crater.
"There's
almost no gravity at the surface," he said. "If you were
standing on the nucleus, you could jump into orbit."
Brownlee's co-authors are also co-investigators for the Stardust mission.
They are Friedrich Horz, Michael Zolensky and Zdenek Sekanina of NASA's
Johnson Space Center in Houston; Ray Newburn, Thomas Duxbury and Peter
Tsou of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.; Scott Sandford
of the NASA Ames Research Center near Sunnyvale, Calif.; Martha Hanner of
the University of Massachusetts; Benton Clark of Lockheed Martin
Astronautics in Denver; Simon Green of the Planetary and Space Sciences
Research Institute in England; and Jochen Kissel of the Max-Planck
Institut für Aeronomie in Germany.
The authors speculate that the comet's surface has so many discernable
features because most of it either absorbed impacts from other space
bodies or vented water or other volatile substances into space via the
comet's jets.
They also suggest that Wild (pronounced vilt) 2 has probably lost only
about three feet of its surface since a close encounter with Jupiter in
1974 moved it closer to the sun, where greater heat means the comet loses
more of its mass.
Before 1974 the
comet's orbit carried it far beyond Jupiter, and long ago it likely was in
the Kuiper Belt, a ring of sub-planet-sized objects beyond the orbit of
Pluto.
Many of the
features visible on the comet's surface probably are billions of years
old, perhaps from around the time that life first arose on Earth, Brownlee
said.
If that is the
case, the nucleus almost certainly carries evidence of how the solar
system came together in the first place, evidence the scientists hope is
contained in the return capsule en route to Earth.
The images also show that a popular notion of comet structure – that it
essentially is a pile of rubble packed loosely and traveling through space
– does not apply to Wild 2, Brownlee said.
"We're sure this is a rigid material because it can support cliffs
and spires," he said.
Stardust is a collaboration of the UW, NASA and its Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, managed by the California Institute of Technology, and
Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Other key members
are The Boeing Co., Germany's Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische
Physik, NASA Ames Research Center and the University of Chicago.
Brownlee suspects the comet will give the collaborating scientists still
more surprises, and will help them unlock the secrets to Wild 2's
beginnings, and Earth's, before it finally meets its end, probably
sometime in the distant future.
"Its fate is that it will hit the sun or a planet, or it will get
thrown out of the solar system, if it doesn't disintegrate first," he
said.
University of Washington - http://www.washington.edu
|
Thousands
Gather at Stonehenge
Wiltshire UK June 20, 2004 (BBC) - Thousands of revelers are expected at
Stonehenge in Wiltshire to mark the summer solstice. The 5,000-year-old
World Heritage site is again open to the public, following earlier years
in which it was closed amid fears of damage to the stones.
In 2003, more than 30,000 people enjoyed the event, with good weather
greeting the crowd at sunrise.
On Monday, the sun will rise at 0458 BST, with a forecast of sunny spells
and showers from the Met Office. In some earlier years there have been
battles between police and revellers, including the infamous 1985
encounter dubbed the Battle of Beanfield.
The violent
confrontation between 300 people who wanted to reach the stones and the
police saw 12 people hospitalized. Police have issued several warnings and
anybody going to the site is liable to be searched. The constabulary adds
that traffic on the A303 and A360 next to the site is expected to be very
busy during Monday morning.
English Heritage which looks after the site has issued strict rules. Those
going will be only be allowed a small amount of alcohol for personal
use.
Only acoustic instruments are allowed to accompany the sunrise, and
amplified music is deemed "inappropriate".
Access to the stones will be allowed from 2200 BST on Sunday, but climbing
on them is banned.
[Party on, English
Heritage! Ed.]
Stonehenge
Lives!
UK Economic
& Social Research Council Press Release
June 17, 2004 -
More understanding among all sides in the great Stonehenge debate might be
made if the world was shown images of how the site is experienced by
visitors today rather than only its imagined past, suggests new research
sponsored by the ESRC.
This research is
published today as a part of Social Science Week.
But the project, co-directed by Dr Jenny Blain of Sheffield Hallam
University and Dr Robert Wallis of Richmond University, London, admits
this would undermine the very potent and almost universal need for
Stonehenge to remain 'essentially preserved', shrouded in mystery, and the
ancient guardian of a hidden past.
A report from their 'Sacred Sites, Contested Rights/Rites' project, comes
at a time when considerable alliances have been formed at a public inquiry
in Salisbury by groups fighting redevelopment plans for the Stonehenge
area.
These include a
tunnel to take the A303 and the siting of a new visitor center.
The project examined what have come to be known as sacred sites, and the
climate of mistrust between heritage management and archaeologists on one
side, and pagans and alternative interest groups on the other.
It included a detailed, systematic analysis of available published
material, websites and press coverage, along with fieldwork and
discussions with visitors and local people at Stonehenge and similar
places.
Dr Blain said: "Stonehenge is the centre of an on-going struggle
between travelers, pagans, 'Druids', members of the 'alternative'
community, English Heritage, landowners and the police. The situation
there spotlights differences between, on one hand, heritage concerns about
preservation for future generations, and on the other, the demands of
pagans and others who want open access for everyone."
Accommodations
reached between the different parties at times of solstices and equinoxes
remain contentious, and distrust is rife, says the report. It points out,
however, that dividing lines have been drawn up differently over the
current redevelopment plans.
For many pagans, prehistoric sites are not ruins but living temples or
sacred sites. They feel drawn to these places to perform seasonal rituals
or to observe astronomical events. Many pagans, including Druids, accept
the 'preservation ethos', regarding such things as stone circles, barrows
and iron age forts as artifacts of pre-Christian paganism, and therefore
sacred.
Access is important to them, but not at the expense of preserving sites
for future generations. However, other Druids and pagans, notably groups
campaigning for the return of the Stonehenge free-festival, call for mass
public celebrations, especially at the summer solstice.
The study points out that archaeologists investigating the religious
significance of sites rarely consider rituals of the present day,
dismissing them as invalid. Some heritage managers speak directly with
pagan and other groups, and may even attend festivals, yet this is seldom
recorded officially.
Pagans sympathetic to preservation are interested in archaeological views
and want to become involved in site maintenance. They also try to explain
their perceptions about landscapes as 'living' entities. But
archaeologists who take part in pagan conferences tend to provide
information rather than seek it, and the result is frustration for the
groups.
Picture presentations of sites such as Stonehenge invariably show them as
dramatic ruins in splendid isolation, removing any signs of people or
present-day activity. And the emphasis on such things as visitor centers
and 'interpretation' handed out to naïve visitors, suggests a 'top-down'
approach by middle-class heritage management, explaining something from a
'closed' past.
Dr Blain said: "Our project suggests that open and transparent
dialogue is needed between all the interested groups. And this must begin
with an appreciation of diversity."
Economic & Social Research Council - http://www.esrc.ac.uk |
Stanford
University Press Release
June 18, 2004 - In an article posted June 10 to the Astrophysical Journal
Letters website, astrophysicists at Stanford report spotting a black hole
so massive that it's more than 10 billion times the mass of our sun.
More important,
this heavyweight is so far away that the scientists think it formed when
the universe first began to light up with stars and galaxies, so it may
provide a window into our cosmological origins.
"In cosmology, it turns out that 'a galaxy a long time ago' and 'far,
far away' really do go together," says Associate Professor Roger
Romani, who with graduate student David Sowards-Emmerd and Professor Peter
Michelson of Stanford, and radio astronomer Lincoln Greenhill of the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, spotted one of the oldest
supermassive black holes yet found.
The scientists
collaborate at the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
at Stanford. "In this case, we're looking at [a black hole] far
enough away that it's within a billion years of the origin of it all, the
Big Bang."
The supermassive black hole sits in the center of a galaxy. A disk of
stars and gas swirl around the black hole and eventually get sucked in.
"That generates enormous amounts of power, enormous amounts of
energy," Romani says. "It's far more efficient even than nuclear
fusion. These gravity-powered sources are the most powerful sources in the
universe."
As black holes go, this one is a messy eater. It's Jabba the Hutt, in
fact, gobbling up its galaxy so quickly that not everything is making it
down its throat past the point of no return - that place, called the
"event horizon," where not even light can escape gravity's
strongest pull. The matter that doesn't make it past the event horizon is
spewing back up in the form of accelerated high-energy particles.
If a black hole amid a galaxy shoots out high-energy particles in narrow
jets that just happen to be aimed at Earth, astrophysicists give the whole
thing a special name - "blazar."
Amazingly, these
blazars can be detected at nearly all energies, even at the high energy of
gamma rays. In fact, distant blazars seem to dominate the gamma-ray sky
and can obscure other objects of interest. Pulsars, spinning neutron stars
nearby in our own galaxy, can also emit gamma rays, but far fewer of them
are known. Romani, whose main interest is pulsars, wanted to identify and
discard blazars so he could concentrate on the neutron stars.
"I got started working on the blazars as a way of culling the wheat
from the chaff," Romani says. "But then the chaff proved just as
interesting."
In preparation for a mission that is scheduled to launch in 2007, the
co-authors have surveyed 200 blazars; eventually they hope to survey
2,000. The mission, led by Michelson, will use the Gamma Ray Large Area
Space Telescope (GLAST) to study high-energy sources of radiation in the
universe, such as supermassive black holes, merging neutron stars and hot
streams of gas moving at nearly the speed of light. It is funded by NASA,
the U.S. Department of Energy and government agencies in France, Italy,
Japan and Sweden.
"Something really new is waiting to be found in the gamma-ray
sky," Romani says. "If we could identify all the blazars, tag
the pulsars - the things that are left over, that's where the really new
discoveries will be."
Blazar hunting
In photographs, blazars look just like stars. So how do scientists spot
them? The co-authors first identified gamma rays seen by the Energetic
Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET), a GLAST precursor initiated by
Stanford physics Professor Robert Hofstadter in the 1970s and subsequently
directed by Michelson.
Greenhill led the effort to obtain radio images of the blazar jet using
the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA). Funded by the National Science
Foundation and operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, the
VLBA is essentially a radio camera. It consists of 10 dish antennas - 25
meters wide and distributed from Hawaii across the United States to St.
Croix - slaved together with computers to create a composite image with a
resolution Greenhill calls "comparable to what they would get with a
single antenna about as large as a continent."
To find out how far away the blazar was, Romani and Sowards-Emmerd used
the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET), an optical instrument in a remote part
of Texas, to obtain spectral patterns of visible and infrared light. HET
is a joint project of the University of Texas at Austin, Pennsylvania
State University, Stanford, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Spectroscopy reveals signatures of elements in a galaxy's gases. Elements
such as hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon and oxygen radiate at specific
energies, or equivalently at specific wavelengths. A consequence of cosmic
expansion is that those wavelengths get shifted to the red part of the
spectrum, or "red-shifted," if an object is extremely far away.
The red shift corresponds to age. "The higher that number, the
smaller the universe was when the light was emitted - hence, the earlier
you're talking about," Romani explains.
The Hobby-Eberly Telescope told the researchers that the red shift of
their blazar was 5.5. This high number told them this was not just some
star in our backyard; it was an enormous source of energy shining from way
across the universe.
"It's amazing to find something so interesting and unique in a
relatively small survey," says Sowards-Emmerd, who re-analyzed EGRET
data to select the targets examined by HET and analyzed the optical data.
"We immediately realized that a high-redshift blazar and gamma-ray
source would allow us to test our understanding of relativistic radio jets
and their interaction with the cosmic microwave background leftover from
the Big Bang," Greenhill says.
"It's a searchlight that's set so far away that it illuminates matter
and radiation all the way between us, between time one billion years after
the Big Bang and now," Romani says. "If you can detect it with a
gamma-ray telescope, you have a handle on the birth of stars and galaxies
between then and now that you never had before."
Scientists are currently stymied about how a black hole could have gotten
so big so fast. How do you take something big enough to hold 1,000 solar
systems and as heavy as all of the stars in our Milky Way galaxy put
together, and quickly crunch-collapse it?
Scientists think the universe formed 13.7 billion years ago with the Big
Bang. The distance of the blazar indicates it formed a billion years after
that.
"What's
interesting about a billion years after the Big Bang is that this marks
the end of the 'Dark Age,"' Romani says.
"The universe
first formed with an enormous flash of light and heat - that's the Big
Bang - and then cooled off. And everything's dark for about a billion
years. And toward the end of that period, the first stars and black holes
and galaxies start collapsing and forming and turning on. We talk about
that as the end of the Dark Age.
"So it's very
interesting, and this is one of the big pushes in cosmology, to find
objects back in the tail end of the Dark Age, when things are first
lighting up, and then to use those to figure out how everything we have in
the universe formed."
Extreme physics
In the next year, the scientists hope to use the VLBA to take a better
picture of the jet detected with radio waves and then observe its X-ray
spectrum. This will help illuminate the matter between the supermassive
black hole and Earth, clarify the black hole's size and characterize the
jet's material as it moves away from the black hole at nearly the speed of
light.
"Studying these things gives us a window into the sort of physical
processes that we can't yet control here on Earth," Romani says.
"They're the extremes of physics."
Those extremes fascinate Romani. "Pulsars are, I think, the most
extreme objects in our universe," he says. These cores of dead stars
have collapsed, but not far enough to form an event horizon, so they are
just short of turning into black holes. They are the densest things in the
measurable universe. They have the strongest magnetic fields. Their
surfaces have extremely high temperatures. They are cosmic accelerators
that speed particles to the highest energies known.
So far, scientists have found only a handful of gamma-ray pulsars, and
Romani is particularly excited about GLAST as a means of hunting down more
in the Milky Way.
"I'm particularly interested in ways in which you could find extreme
physics out there in the cosmos and get a handle on physics of the 22nd or
23rd century by seeing what's going on in the sky."
Roger Romani's web page: http://astro.stanford.edu/home/rwr/home.html
Stanford University - http://www.stanford.edu/news |
New
Scientist News Release
June 16, 2004 - Weapons that can incapacitate crowds of people by sweeping
a lightning-like beam of electricity across them are being readied for
sale to military and police forces in the US and Europe. At present,
commercial stun guns target one person at a time, and work only at close
quarters.
The new breed of
non-lethal weapons can be used on many people at once and operate over far
greater distances. But human rights groups are appalled by the fact that
no independent safety tests have been carried out, and by their potential
for indiscriminate use.
The weapons are designed to address the perceived shortcomings of the
Taser, the electric-shock gun already used by 4000 police departments in
the US and undergoing trials with some police forces in the UK.
It hits the victim with two darts that trail current-carrying wires, which
limit its range to a maximum of 7 meters.
As a single shot,
short-range weapon, the Taser is of little use in crowd control. And
Tasers have no effect on vehicles.
These limitations are beginning to be overcome. Engineers working for the
US Department of Defense's research division, DARPA, and defense companies
in Europe have been working out how to create an electrically conductive
path between a gun and a target without using wires. A weapon under
development by Rheinmetall, based in Düsseldorf, Germany, creates a
conducting channel by using a small explosive charge to squirt a stream of
tiny conductive fibers through the air at the victim (New Scientist, 24
May 2003, p 19).
Meanwhile, Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems (XADS), based in Anderson,
Indiana, will be one of the first companies to market another type of
wireless weapon. Instead of using fibres, the $9000 Close Quarters Shock
Rifle (pictured) projects an ionized gas, or plasma, towards the target,
producing a conducting channel. It will also interfere with electronic
ignition systems and stop vehicles.
"We will be able to fire a stream of electricity like water out of a
hose at one or many targets in a single sweep," claims XADS president
Peter Bitar.
The gun has been designed for the US Marine Corps to use for crowd control
and security purposes and is due out next year. It is based on early,
unwieldy technology and has a range of only 3 meters, but an operator can
debilitate multiple targets by sweeping it across them for "as long
as there is an input power source," says Bitar.
XADS is also planning a more advanced weapon which it hopes will have a
range of 100 meters or more. Instead of firing ionized gas, it will
probably use a powerful laser to ionize the air itself. The idea has been
around for decades, says LaVerne Schlie, a laser expert at the US Air
Force Research Lab in Kirtland, New Mexico. It has only become practical
with advances in high-power solid-state lasers.
"Before, it
took a laser about the size of two trucks," says Schlie. "Now we
can do it with something that fits on a tabletop."
The laser pulse must be very intense, but can be brief. So the makers of
the weapons plan to use a UV laser to fire a 5-joule pulse lasting just
0.4 picoseconds- equating to a momentary power of more than 10 million
megawatts.
This intense pulse - which is said not to harm the eyes - ionizes the air,
producing long, thread-like filaments of glowing plasma that can be
sustained by repeating the pulse every few milliseconds. This plasma
channel is then used to deliver a shock to the victims similar to a
Taser's 50,000-volt, 26-watt shock.
HSV Technologies of
San Diego, California is also working on stun and vehicle-stopping shock
weapons with ranges of over 100 meters. And another company, Ionatron of
Tuscon, Arizona, is due to supply a prototype wireless vehicle-mounted
weapon to the US Department of Defense by the end of the year.
But the advent of wireless stun weapons has horrified human rights groups.
Robin Coupland of the Red Cross says they risk becoming a new instrument
of torture. And Brian Wood of Amnesty International says the long-range
stun guns could "inflict pain and other suffering on innocent
bystanders".
And there are safety concerns. Of the 30,000 times US police officers have
fired Tasers, in 40 instances people stunned by them later died. The
deaths have been attributed to factors such as overdoses of drugs and
alcohol, or fighting with officers, rather than the electric shock.
In a statement, Taser International chief Rick Smith said: "In every
single case the medical examiner has attributed the direct cause of death
to causes other than the Taser." Amnesty is not convinced, however,
and wants an independent study of the effects of all existing and emerging
electric-shock weapons.
This article appears in New Scientist issue: 19 JUNE 2004
New Scientist - http://www.newscientist.com |
Stepford
Steps Up
By FLAtRich
June 20, 2004 (eXoNews) - I suspect a lot of moviegoers will pass on the
new version of The Stepford Wives remembering the classic 1975 version and
thinking why bother? I was in that club, but someone said the new one was
a satire of the original so I was intrigued.
Turns out that screenwriter Paul Rudnick and director Frank Oz have
managed to pay respectful homage to the original William Goldman
screenplay. The excellent cast breathes new life into an updated storyline
to give us one of the best remakes in recent memory.
Whether Stepford 2004 is a satire or just a comedy remains in the eyes of
the beholder, however.
The original Stepford is usually classed as a thriller, but it was a
genuine satire reflecting the rise of empowered women in American life.
Based on a
bestselling novel by Ira Levin, Stepford 1975 gave us a cabal of secretive
husbands creating male ideal stereotypical "perfect" wives who
stayed home and baked cookies in high heels by day and still delivered
sexually at night.
In the original, Joanna Eberhard (Katharine Ross) arrives in Stepford as a
young bride and discovers the town full of fashion zombie wives.
Her pal Bobbie
Markowe (Paula Prentiss) shows up and the two begin to unravel a mystery
the Stepford husbands are hiding.
In the new version,
Joanna (Nicole Kidman) is a TV executive who takes reality programming one
step too far and loses her big network job. She
and less-talented husband (Matthew Broderick) move to Stepford, where
Joanna discovers the town full of fashion zombie wives.
Joanna makes pals with two more new arrivals, best selling writer Bobbie
Markowitz (Bette Midler) and flamboyant gay Roger Bannister (Roger Bart)
and the three begin to unravel the mystery the Stepford husbands are
hiding.
Much of the new Stepford is indeed the old Stepford, but it's a way
funnier Stepford than the original.
Glenn Close and
Bette Midler easily steal the film from superstar Kidman, deftly assisted
by Roger Bart.
Kidman is always
good, but her competition this time is better.
I guess this follows a Stepford tradition. Paula Prentiss just as easily
stole the original film from Katharine Ross.
The big surprise is that there is a big surprise because Rudnick and Oz
take their Stepford one step beyond the Stepford of Goldman and original
director Bryan Forbes. If you are lucky enough to see Stepford 2004 before
someone tells you the big surprise, you'll probably be as delighted as I
was with the remake.
Official Stepford - http://www.stepfordwivesmovie.com
Nip/Tuck
Second Season
By BRIDGET
BYRNE
Associated Press
LOS ANGELES June
17, 2004 (AP) - The two men in crimson scrubs and rubber gloves are having
a bit of a squabble.
"I'll run lead, you'll assist," pronounces Dr. Sean
McNamara.
"No, there's media. I'm co-lead ... I'll be stepping up with you to
any microphones," Dr. Christian Troy snaps back.
"You want to take this outside," snarls an enraged
McNamara.
"Love to," sneers Troy.
Behind them on an operating table lie comatose conjoined twins, surrounded
by a team of doctors appalled by the plastic surgeons' untimely
bickering.
"Nip/Tuck" is back, and more outrageous than ever.
The FX series about
the two ethically challenged surgeons, portrayed by Dylan Walsh as
McNamara and Julian McMahon as Troy, begins its second season Tuesday at
10 p.m. EDT.
Creator Ryan Murphy says this season will be "more emotional,"
the surgeries "more expensive" and the guest stars "higher
profile." Vanessa Redgrave appears in the premiere episode playing
the mother of McNamara's estranged wife, played by Redgrave's daughter,
Joely Richardson.
"Our show is a
tone piece. It's pushing the envelope and yet walking a line of drama that
I think is very responsible," says Murphy. "People have said —
and I agree — that every one of our episodes feels like a little
independent movie."
The episode filming this day at Paramount Studios provides a metaphor for
the theme that underscores the entire new season: Can the doctors'
contentious partnership survive?
Crainopagus (joined at the head) twins, 42-year-old Lori and Reba
Schappell, portray conjoined twins Rose and Raven Rosenberg.
Lying on an L-shaped operating table, Lori as Rose whispers to her sister,
"I'm afraid. Sing to me," as they wait for the anesthetic to
kick in. Reba as Raven softly croons, "... gonna buy you a
mockingbird ..."
The twins' performance drew applause from cast and crew. Then they were
replaced on the operating table by prosthetic figures created from casts
of their bodies.
Although the series takes dramatic license, technical adviser Linda Klein,
a registered nurse, is meticulous that the operations look
authentic.
For this episode she consulted Dr James Bradley, associate professor of
plastic surgery at UCLA Medical Center, part of the team that successfully
separated the conjoined Alvarez twins from Guatemala in August 2002.
"They seem to usually have bizarre surroundings to the surgeries, but
the surgeries for the most part are accurate," comments Bradley.
"The technical aspect is thought out well, based in fact and reality.
The story line, that's the creativity of the writers, not something that
we get into."
Bradley's aware that "Nip/Tuck" has attracted its share of
criticism from plastic surgeons concerned about the ethics of the show's
doctor characters. However, he says there's greater concern among his
peers about reality shows such as Fox's "The Swan" or ABC's
"Extreme Makeover" that make it seem "these long
complicated operations are a walk in the park, rather than serious
surgery."
"Nip/Tuck" certainly doesn't make cosmetic surgery look as neat
and nifty as the show's title suggests.
"I feel a moral responsibility to show what the suffering is. I don't
want to glamorize it," Murphy says. "I used to think that
plastic surgeons treated faces like pieces of porcelain. What I've come to
realize is they actually treat them like pieces of sirloin."
Klein, who uses
steak to simulate muscle during the fake operations, says, "Ryan
likes to be as graphic as possible."
When providing the blood and guts, she keeps in mind her startled reaction
to first witnessing a face lift "when they peel the skin off the
muscle and actually hold someone's face away from their body."
Murphy says "Nip/Tuck" episodes "are like a Grimm's fairy
tale. There's always a moral, order is always restored, and the running
theme is be careful what you wish for..."
Consequently, story and character development on the show can overshadow
clinical realism.
"I like to take dramatic license," says McMahon.
"I am
constantly battling Nurse Linda, as I call her, because she says, `That's
not the way.' I'll do what I'm told and whatever's best, but when it comes
down to it, I'm going to do what's necessary to get across our message at
that point of time — one of the battles the character is going through,
usually some kind of evolution, moral dilemma, on the precipice of
disaster."
Murphy notes that in the second season, the more conservative of the two
surgeons, Sean McNamara, will be doing more "bad guy
stuff."
"It's interesting, the two guys almost switch roles in some great
way," Murphy says. "So last year if you thought Christian was
the bad guy I think this year you may think he's the good guy and Sean is
the sort of morally ambiguous one."
Nip/Tuck Official - http://www.fxnetwork.com/shows/originals/niptuck
Moore &
Bradbury Flap Over Fahrenheit 9/11
By PAUL
CHAVEZ
Associated Press Writer
LOS ANGELES June
19, 2004 (AP) - Ray Bradbury is demanding an apology from filmmaker
Michael Moore for lifting the title from his classic science-fiction novel
"Fahrenheit 451" without permission and wants the new
documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" to be renamed.
"He didn't ask my permission," Bradbury, 83, told The Associated
Press on Friday. "That's not his novel, that's not his title, so he
shouldn't have done it."
The 1953 novel, widely considered Bradbury's masterpiece, portrays an ugly
futuristic society in which firemen burn homes and libraries in order to
destroy the books inside and keep people from thinking
independently.
"Fahrenheit 451" takes its title from the temperature at which
books burn. Moore has called "Fahrenheit 9/11" the
"temperature at which freedom burns."
His film, which won top honors in May at the Cannes Film Festival, charges
that the Bush administration acted ineptly before the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks, then played on the public's fear of future terrorism to gain
support for the war against Iraq. It opens nationwide next Friday.
Bradbury, who
hadn't seen the movie, said he called Moore's company six months ago to
protest and was promised Moore would call back.
He finally got that
call last Saturday, Bradbury said, adding Moore told him he was
"embarrassed."
"He suddenly realized he's let too much time go by," the author
said by phone from his home in Los Angeles' Cheviot Hills section.
Joanne Doroshow, a spokeswoman for "Fahrenheit 9/11," said the
film's makers have "the utmost respect for Ray Bradbury."
"Mr. Bradbury's work has been an inspiration to all of us involved in
this film, but when you watch this film you will see the fact that the
title reflects the facts that the movie explores, the very real life
events before, around and after 9-11," she said.
Bradbury, who is a registered political independent, said he would rather
avoid litigation and is "hoping to settle this as two gentlemen, if
he'll shake hands with me and give me back my book and title."
Moore's film needed new distributors after Disney refused to let its
Miramax subsidiary release it, claiming it was too politically charged.
The documentary was later bought by Miramax bosses Harvey and Bob
Weinstein, who lined up Lions Gate and IFC Films to help distribute
it.
The movie's distributors are appealing to lower its R rating to PG-13 and
a screening has been set for Tuesday by the Motion Picture Association of
America's appeals board.
Bradbury's book was made into a 1966 movie directed by Francois Truffaut.
A new edition of
the book is scheduled for release in eight weeks, Bradbury said, and plans
are in the works for a new film version, to be directed by Frank Darabont.
Superman?
Hollywood June 17, 2004 (Sci Fi Wire) - After several highly publicized
false starts, Warner Brothers is putting the final pieces together for its
upcoming Superman film, which could begin production in late 2004, Variety
reported.
Location scouting has already begun in Australia, and producers Neal
Moritz (Fast and the Furious, XXX) and Gilbert Adler (Constantine, Ghost
Ship) are in negotiations with the studio to produce, the trade paper
said.
Although director McG is not officially attached, he tested six actors
last week for the lead role, including Jason Behr (Roswell), Henry Cavill
(The Count of Monte Cristo), Jared Padalecki (New York Minute) and Michael
Cassidy, Variety reported.
Previous attempts to launch the film with directors such as Tim Burton and
Brett Ratner failed to get off the ground due to creative differences with
studio executives. The current script, written by Alias creator J.J.
Abrams, is budgeted for $200 million, but the project has yet to be
green-lighted. The film will revolve around Superman's battle with Lex
Luthor and a mysterious killer from the planet Krypton who has come to
hunt down the Man of Steel, the trade paper reported.
Andre
Braugher is a Thief for FX
LOS ANGELES June 18, 2004 (Zap2it.com) - The long-gestating project
"Thief" has received an official pilot order from FX.
Production on the
pilot, starring Emmy winner Andre Braugher ("Homicide,"
"Gideon's Crossing") as the title character, is scheduled to
begin in August in New Orleans. Paul McGuigan ("Gangster No. 1,"
"Wicker Park") has signed on to direct.
FX originally ordered "Thief" last fall as a cast-contingent
pilot. It went through some revisions when John Landgraf took over as the
cable network's president of entertainment early this year, and that
revised version attracted Braugher.
"We got excited because it's a different kind of part than Andrea
would be expected to play," Landgraf tells The Hollywood Reporter,
"and he brings a level of gravity to the role that is unexpected for
a show about thieves."
The show will focus on Braugher and his crew, who become targets for
Chinese gangsters as well as the police while planning their next job.
Braugher's character also struggles away from the job when a stepdaughter
(Mae Whitman, "State of Grace") he hardly knows enters his life.
Malik Yoba ("New York Undercover") has also joined the cast as a
member of Braugher's team. Will Yun Lee ("Witchblade") will play
one of the gangsters.
Norman Morrill wrote the "Thief" script and is executive
producing with Gavin Polone and Vivian Cannon of production company
Pariah.
Lois Visits
Smallville
Hollywood June 16,
2004 (Sci Fi Wire) - A casting call has gone out for the role of Lois
Lane, Clark Kent's future love interest, who will reportedly appear in
four episodes of the WB series Smallville, according to Kryptonsite.
The fan site reported that a twenty-something Lois Lane will travel to
Smallville in search of her cousin, Chloe Sullivan (series regular Allison
Mack).
Lois is described
in the casting breakdown as "Caucasian, smart, beautiful, urban,
headstrong, and no-nonsense."
Producers are also looking for a young actor to play a new character named
Jason Teague, a college student at Metropolis University who will become a
regular cast member. There is no word yet on which actors or actresses are
being considered for the two roles.
Smallville will begin filming its fourth season in Vancouver, B.C. in
July.
Smallville Official - http://www.thewb.com/Shows/Show/0,7353,||126,00.html
Winona Ryder
Reduced
By ANGELA
WATERCUTTER
Associated Press Writer
BEVERLY HILLS June 18, 2004 (AP) - The judge in Winona Ryder's shoplifting
case reduced her felony convictions to misdemeanors Friday and allowed her
to finish probation unsupervised.
After reviewing Ryder's probation report, Superior Court Judge Elden Fox
warned the actress that she'll be sent to jail if she breaks the law
before the end of her probation in December 2005.
Fox then asked whether she had any questions.
"No," Ryder replied. "Thank you."
The 32-year-old
"Girl, Interrupted" star was convicted in 2002 of felony grand
theft and vandalism for stealing several thousand dollars worth of
merchandise from a Saks Fifth Avenue store in Beverly Hills the previous
year.
She was placed on three years probation in December 2002 and fined $2,700.
She paid $6,355 in restitution to the store and $1,000 in restitution to
the court. She also was ordered to undergo psychological and drug
counseling.
Ryder had prescription drugs in her possession when she was arrested while
shopping on Dec. 12, 2001. A drug charge was filed but eventually dropped
after a doctor said he had prescribed the medication.
In December, Fox praised the actress for her behavior during probation.
She also has completed 480 hours of community service at the City of Hope
Medical Center in Duarte.
Wearing a black pantsuit with a white blouse and black cap, Ryder smiled
in court Friday and shook hands with Deputy District Attorney Ann Rundle
after the ruling.
"I'm very glad to have this case completed," Rundle said.
Ryder's attorney, Shepard Kopp, commended the judge's decision to reduce
the charges to misdemeanor theft. By placing Ryder on unsupervised
probation, she'll have greater freedom to work as an actress, Kopp
said.
The judge "didn't want to do anything to damage her career,"
Kopp added. "Eventually, this case will be expunged. There will be
nothing on her record."
The judge also approved a government motion to have surveillance
videotapes used as evidence in the case returned to the district
attorney's office. Clothing stolen from Saks Fifth Avenue will be
destroyed.
Ryder, who began her film career as a teenager in 1986, earned
back-to-back Academy Award nominations in the '90s for "Little
Women" and the "The Age of Innocence." Her other films
include "Heathers," "Edward Scissorhands" and
"Reality Bites."
Nielsen
Report Defends People Meters
By Meredith
Amdur and Pamela McClintock
New York June 17, 2004 (Variety) - Nielsen Media Research fired back at
critics of its local People Meter panels Thursday, issuing an unusual
interim report on an ongoing audit of its New York service to refute a
"campaign of disinformation."
In a lengthy statement issued late Thursday, the ratings group detailed
and responded to many of the findings of the Media Rating Council audit,
some of which was leaked to the press earlier this week.
Nielsen said the confidential preliminary audit found it largely in
compliance with MRC standards, but that there are four areas out of 85 in
which it's not in "material compliance."
Among the issues raised by the MRC is a discrepancy on race in two of its
30 homes. Nielsen said it was working to find an alternative method to ask
the question in mixed-race homes. Ratings group also said any errors with
regard to undercounting Hispanic viewers in one faulty household will be
corrected through "intensified training of field staff."
Ratings body specifically noted that the MRC audit report did not identify
any problems with undercounting persons of color, nor did it identify
flaws in the People Meter technology. In addition, MRC said nothing about
delaying the rollout of the service.
Opponents such as Fox, Tribune, CBS, Univision and a large number of
advertisers claim the method undercounts minority viewing.
Audit Shows
'People Meter' Flawed
LOS ANGELES June 17, 2004 (Reuters) - A coalition of civil rights
activists opposed to Nielsen Media Research's new method for measuring
local television viewership on Thursday said reported details of an audit
showed the ratings system is flawed.
The Don't Count Us Out coalition, which is allied with News Corp Ltd. in
fighting Nielsen's "people meter" system, called again on the
independent Media Rating Council to release the content of an Ernst &
Young audit of the system launched this month in New York City.
TV Networks
Seek God's Help
By Steve
Gorman
LOS ANGELES June
15, 2004 (Reuters) - Sitcoms are running out of laughs, cop dramas are a
dime a dozen and reality shows are all starting to look alike.
Now U.S. television
networks are turning to a higher power in their quest for loftier ratings.
Inspired by the runaway success of religion-themed novels like the
"Left Behind" series and Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the
Christ," broadcasters are devoting more of their prime-time schedules
to shows dealing with God, faith and the afterlife.
Two such shows, "Joan of Arcadia," the story of a teen-age girl
who speaks to God, and "Tru Calling," about a clairvoyant young
morgue attendant with the power to "relive" the previous day and
help prevent deaths, are coming back for second seasons this fall on CBS
and Fox, respectively.
[Which has nothing to do with Mel's movie, as Joan and Tru had already
arrived and found their fanbase before The Passion hit - not that they are
bigger than Jesus, mind you, just cuter - but it makes good copy, I
suppose. Ed.]
They will join the return of the WB network's veteran drama "7th
Heaven," centered on the family of a minister, and Showtime's darkly
comic afterlife series "Dead Like Me."
And NBC is
launching two new spiritual dramas of its own -- "Medium,"
starring Patricia Arquette as a suburban housewife who helps solve crimes
by communicating with the dead, and "Revelations," an
apocalyptic thriller featuring Bill Pullman as a scientist racing to
thwart Armageddon.
It's not as big a trend as the TV westerns that galloped over the small
screen during the 1960s or the "reality" craze of recent years,
but the upcoming batch of faith-oriented series marks a new high point in
prime-time piety.
Della Reese, an ordained minister and former gospel singer who starred in
the CBS hit "Touched an Angel," sees it as a sign that
spirituality has finally become "fashionable."
NETWORKS GETTING RELIGION
"People have wanted spiritual entertainment for a long time, but the
powers that be said, 'No. Nobody will buy that,"' she told Reuters.
"Now it's come to the place where you know there's nothing else going
to save you but the grace of God."
Network executives, too, have become believers. In a media landscape of
increasingly fragmented viewership, they say the success of religious fare
elsewhere in U.S. pop culture is shaping their age-old quest for the Holy
Grail of commercial television -- a mass audience.
"We think this is something that's been out there for years and has
actually been untapped," NBC Entertainment President Kevin Reilly
said. "The world is in turmoil right now, and when it is, you tend to
see people going for conspiracy theories, going to apocalyptic stories and
spirituality."
He cited the growing popularity of books like the "Left Behind"
novels, a 12-part drama about the second coming drawn from the Book of
Revelation in the New Testament that has sold more than 60 million copies
worldwide.
But religion also figures prominently in a host of bestsellers ranging
from Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code," a modern thriller steeped
in purported secrets about the early Christian church, to Bruce
Wilkinson's "The Prayer of Jabez: How to Get God to Bless Your
Life."
At the same time, inspirational and religious-themed music has become a
growing pop genre in the recording industry.
Jana Riess, the religion book review editor for Publishers Weekly and
author of "What Would Buffy Do? The Vampire Slayer as Spiritual
Guide," said the notion of a divine approach to TV ratings growth
makes sense.
AN UNTAPPED MARKET
"If they're
looking for an untapped market, this is it," she said, noting polls
that show most Americans profess a belief in God and nearly half counting
themselves as born-again or evangelical Christians.
"Americans are a very religious people, but our popular culture
expressions have not always reflected that," she said.
"Those same
people who read the 'Left Behind' books would also like to see films and
television shows that reflect their values and their spiritual
principals."
But a godly theme itself is no guarantee of heavenly ratings. NBC's
animated comedy "God, the Devil and Bob" angered many Christians
and quickly flopped four years ago.
Spirituality in series television also runs counter to decades of
prime-time orthodoxy, which has generally consigned overtly religious
themes to holiday specials.
Faith had a bigger place in the early days of TV.
The long-running soap opera "The Guiding Light" moved from radio
to television in 1952 as a serialized drama centered on a minister and his
family, though the show has evolved into one that generates far more heat
than light. And a real-life Catholic bishop, the Rev. Fulton J. Sheen,
hosted the popular 1950s prime-time show "Life is Worth Living,"
offering weekly lessons in morality illustrated with chalkboard
scribblings.
Religious symbolism and spiritual overtones also abounded on more recent
shows as varied as "M*A*S*H," "Picket Fences,"
"NYPD Blue" and "The Sopranos," said Robert Thompson,
director of Syracuse University's Center for the Study of Popular
Television. But series TV as a whole has remained largely secular.
Notable exceptions of the 1980s and '90s include "Hell Town,"
starring Robert Blake as a two-fisted priest, and inspirational but
nondenominational dramas, "Touched by an Angel" and
"Highway to Heaven."
The latter two, both about angels helping troubled people on Earth, were
disparaged by some critics as cloying but were commercial successes that
lasted several seasons. "It proves that you can do things that don't
have to do with (sex) and people will still buy your product, even if you
use the word 'God,"' Reese said.
|