| CHICAGO, June 1
(Reuters) - Those teen-aged years may not have been as good -- or bad --
as you remember.
In a study published on
Thursday spanning 34 years in a group of middle-aged men, researchers
reported that the likelihood of accurately remembering events from
adolescence is no greater than chance.
The study from Northwestern
University Medical School involved 67 mentally healthy men who were
questioned first at age 14 and again at 48 regarding family relationships,
home environment, dating and sexuality, religion, parental discipline and
general activities.
It found significant
differences between what adults remembered about adolescence and what they
said when they were adolescents.
"It is often said that
adolescence is the period in the life cycle that is most difficult to see
clearly," said Daniel Offer, a co-author of the report. "Our
study of the emotionally laden experience of adolescence as seen through
the lens of 48-year-olds demonstrated that this may indeed be so."
He said the findings are
important for psychiatrists and others who have to obtain historical and
biographical information from patients.
"If accurate memory of
past events and relationships is no better than chance for normal,
mentally healthy individuals, we might expect that the reports of past
experiences by people who are currently medically ill, psychologically
disturbed or otherwise compromised would be even less accurate," he
said.
The study was published in
the June issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry. It did find two exceptions to the fogging of
memory: The men remembered their father's incomes compared to their
ability to make more as adults and those who had girlfriends retained
stronger recollections of that. |